Mud's Tests: One validator says this feed is good, while another says there are problems.
Randy: I added some comments to the original post. But, what the author says is completely correct, except that, the validators do in fact respond alike and that the difference is caused by a typo and bad usability design (which I gotta work on too). The biggest problem is that both validators, do, in fact, report the feed as valid, even though it's really invalid.
Reader Comments 
